|
The Sugar Shack at Tintinhull Farm, 9:00 p.m.
Photograph info: This photograph was taken last night at Tintinhull Farm in Tinicum Township, ten miles south of Durham Township, where they're in the process of boiling down sap to produce maple syrup. (Much more information about Tintinhull Farm in the previous entry.) The sap is collected during the day and brought by tractor to the sugar shack where it's gravity fed into a huge piece of equipment called an evaporator (which you can see through the large window along with plenty of steam). The evaporator is fueled by firewood and reduces 50 gallons of sap to 1 gallon of syrup in about an hour. The farm goes through eight cords of firewood during their month-long syrup production period. Last night Glen and his crew boiled down 200 gallons (I think!) of maple sap. When I went home, my clothes smelled like lightly toasted marshmallows. Heaven! More photos showing sap collection, evaporation and bottling soon... Camera settings and post-processing: Photographed with the Canon EOS 5D Mark II (If you're wondering about the flag in front of the woodpile, by any chance, it's a Gadsden flag. It was breezy and blowing around during the long exposure which is why it looks blurred.) Thank you for visiting Durham Township! -- Kathleen Comments
Great night shot! What would have been the benefit of ISO 100? Just less noise in the image? I can't say I see much noise here in the "Humongous" version, but I'm sure the original is much larger. It is such an interesting process getting sap to syrup. I love the lighting in the picture. Posted by Technobabe on March 6, 2010 8:20 AMCollection buckets are emptied and it's off to the Sugar Shack. Anthony: My eternal goal is to shoot at ISO 100, haha! Yes, always less noise, more color vibrancy, etc. (This opinion is a leftover from many years of shooting Ektachrome 100. I realize it doesn't necessarily carry through to digital, but ...) I thought I'd set the ISO at 100 but was distracted by the elements and set-up. Posted by Kathleen on March 6, 2010 9:56 AMDid you use additional lighting in this? I can see why you wanted the ISO to be 100 but this is still quite lovely. Posted by Barbara Thorbjörnsson on March 6, 2010 11:32 AMBarbara: No lighting on my part but there is a light outside the building illuminating it from ground level. Helps everyone see where they're going since there are no street lights within 5 miles of the place, haha. Posted by Kathleen on March 6, 2010 12:13 PMYou'll get the 100 ISO next time. I really like the "feel" of this photo. Thanks for sharing. Posted by Barbara Thorbjörnsson on March 6, 2010 12:25 PMGorgeous shot! I did the same thing with the ISO with some evening tripod shots at Yellowstone. Posted by julianne on March 6, 2010 2:14 PMLovely image! Unique night shot - I love it! I also LOVE LOVE LOVe real maple syrup, and what a treat it would be to visit the sugar shack! Posted by Suzanne B on March 6, 2010 6:18 PMWhat a fantastic picture! My initial thought was that you had captured a photo of the little house as it was sneezing! Posted by Steve on March 6, 2010 7:54 PMReally like the solitude and the way the tree is illuminated in the background, excellent composition. Posted by Bill Gorton on March 6, 2010 9:59 PMI've never seen a sugar shack before. This looks so idyllic. Posted by Jillian on March 7, 2010 12:09 AMDoes the, "no street lights within 5 miles" remark mean the UPS truck does not pick up? (I was hopping the little room next to the fuel depot was a shipping department.) Love the intricate lacework of bare limbs before the night sky in the Versionale del Humongusto. I would be a little more comfortable standing out here in the dark yard if I could see a hint of terra firma for support. (Jeepers, Kathleen, I assume you were not cropping out some foreground excavation equipment when your compositional judgment literally scraped the bottom of the barrel:) Posted by david tinnon on March 7, 2010 3:47 AMdavid tinnon: If you look closely at the bottom left you'll see the flare of the lamp that's illuminating the building and trees from the ground. I composed the scene so it didn't include that intense glare, but I had to settle for an uncomfortably tiny bit of foreground. (The spirit of Manet told me to go with the discomfort.) Posted by Kathleen on March 7, 2010 9:26 AMThank you so much for capturing this and the writeup. This country has moved away from true syrup in exchange for awful awful replacements. I wish I could walk to glen's place and buy a bottle. There is nothing better than true maple syrup. I have a hard time sharing it with the pancakes. Posted by matt on March 7, 2010 9:32 AMMagical!! The light is amazing!!! Posted by Marcie on March 7, 2010 11:39 AMBrief ode to composition The message I'm getting now seems to be mixed.... Kathleen; Well, you could have scooted the barrel over to block the offending fixture, but I suppose Sisely, Pissarro or Kinkade would have objected... so let's go with you and Manet. (Actually, the darkened windows would have likely offended Mr. K considerably, but you are a risk taker:) Posted by david tinnon on March 7, 2010 5:29 PMA photo like a fairytale. This is what they mean when they talk about a photo telling a story! I don't think the ISO 400 has harmed you much (if at all)! :) Posted by Leonie on March 8, 2010 6:36 AMmy point of view with Canon 5D Mark II, ISO 400 is quite ok and the photo looking so nice, but exactly what leonie said "ISO 400 has harmed you much (if at all)" but if there was a source of light next time please use ISO 100, my experience,i work in News Agency and if something goes wrong with the photo, photo editor wont give you a second chance, i am not trying to teach some, who is far more experience but just a presence of mind can help you take better quality photo, and in the end that all that matters. Posted by shutterimagery on March 8, 2010 1:19 PMBonsoir, almost dreamy house Posted by desfocado on March 8, 2010 7:07 PM
Uh oh, Tinicum Twp is trying to ban all "outdoor wood-burning boilers"... is this farm being targeted for that? Posted by JeffG on March 14, 2010 1:46 PMBeautiful shot. I love long exposures and how the lights and smoke turn out. Posted by Peter on March 15, 2010 3:04 PMSpeak!
|